![]() ![]() It’s possible for it to be variance, but I’ve never seen the % dip below 102 at any point, and I have personally noted both win and loss streaks during play. Regardless, it pays better than it should, at least within the given sample of 5000 games, but I’ve only recorded a sample that large at $1 bets. Perhaps the fact that a push still counts in your favor as you are turning $1 of play money into $1 redeemable helps? There’s no particular mechanic that should intrinsically make it positive, at least I don’t believe so. After 5000 games of results, my returns were actually 103% of all games played, meaning 108% of the money spent. I originally found this out because I assumed the game would have the traditional ~99.5% return that is expected of BJ, and I would leverage the fact that you receive a 5% bonus upon purchase to still come out ahead. I don’t know WHY it works, but I’m sharing that it does work when playing optimally at the $1 level. There’s not a clear cause for it, but it’s stayed consistent over 5000 games. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |